Blog Archive

Wednesday, 20 October 2021

Afenifere knocks FG over amendment charges in Kanu’s case

File: Leader of the Indigenous People Of Biafra, Nnamdi Kanu


As the Federal Government put forward its amended seven-count charge against the detained leader of the Indigenous People of Biafra, Nnamdi Kanu in court, the pan-Yoruba socio-political organisation, Afenifere, has said the FG was not serious about the case .

The Federal Government put forward its amended seven-count charge against IPOB leader at the Federal High Court, Abuja, on Wednesday.

The National Secretary General of the association, Mr Sola Ebiseni, who commented on the case in a statement, said it appeared that the case had come to its wit’s end .

The statement read in part, “With the amended seven counts charges against Nnamdi Kanu, as released by the media, it appears the Federal Government has come to its wit’s end in the case with the Biafran Leader and self-determination agitations generally.

“Without prejudice to the determination of the case by the court, it is clear that its end will certainly compound agitations on the national question, an ill-wind that will blow the Buhari administration and Nigeria no good.

Read Also 


“It is time that the Attorney General, Abubakar Malami exercised authoritative superintendence over his office as the Chief Law Officer and adviser of the Federal Government in a way that the interest of the nation may be served than indulge in petty politicking to massage the ego and pander to the personal idiosyncrasies of the President.

“For instance, the alleged name-calling of Muhammadu Buhari, in April 2015, even before he became the President, would ordinarily be ignored as childish vulgar abuse unworthy of a high profile criminal prosecution.”


 
It added, “A government that admits that mere words of Kanu has become law, either by legitimate obedience or fear, even while in detention, should think out of the box.

“The appropriate mindset is to admit that Nigeria, as a wobbling contraption of entrenched nationalities, is negotiable and that negotiations do not necessarily lead to dismemberment. Let the dialogue begin.”

Sunday, 17 October 2021

Does Blood Type Affect Marriage Compatibility?

Blood types /

Blood type has no effect on your ability to have and maintain a happy, healthy marriage. There are some concerns about blood type compatibility if you’re planning to have biological children with your partner, but there are options during pregnancy that can help counteract these risks.

It’s a good idea to know your partner’s blood type in the event of an emergency, however. And, depending on your and your partner’s blood type, you may even be able to donate blood to them in an emergency.

Read on to learn more about blood type, and how it may affect your marriage.



What are the different blood types?

Everybody has a blood type. There are four major blood groups:

  • A
  • B
  • O
  • AB

These groups differ primarily on the presence or absence of antigens that can stimulate an immune response.

In addition to these four groups, a protein called Rh factor that may be either present (+) or absent (-) within each group. This further defines blood groups into eight common types:

  • A+
  • A-
  • B+
  • B-
  • O+
  • O-
  • AB+
  • AB-

Your blood type is something you inherit, so it’s predetermined at birth. You cannot change your blood type later in life.

How does blood compatibility affect pregnancy?

Compatibility in blood group is only a concern for couples if a pregnancy is involved where both partners are the biological parents. That’s because of RH factor.

Rh factor is an inherited protein, so being Rh negative (-) or Rh positive (+) is determined by your parents. The most common type is Rh positive.

Being Rh positive or negative typically does not affect your health, but it could affect your pregnancy.

Rh factor and pregnancy

Rh factor can be a concern if the biological mother is Rh- and the baby is Rh+. Blood cells from an Rh+ baby crossing its Rh- mother’s bloodstream might trigger an immune response. The mother’s body might form antibodies to attack the baby’s Rh+ red blood cells.

At your first prenatal visit, your doctor will suggest a blood type and Rh factor screening. If you are Rh-, your doctor will test your blood again later in your pregnancy to see if you have formed antibodies against Rh factor. That would indicate that your baby is Rh+.

If your doctor identifies a potential for Rh incompatibility, your pregnancy will be monitored closely for any related issues and may need extra care.

Although your blood and your baby’s blood typically do not mix during pregnancy, a minimal amount of your baby’s blood and your blood could come in contact with each other during delivery. If there’s an Rh incompatibility and this happens, your body might produce Rh antibodies against Rh factor.

These antibodies will not cause problems to an Rh+ baby during the first pregnancy. But they can cause issues if you have a subsequent pregnancy and are carrying another child that is Rh+.

If there was an Rh incompatibility in a first pregnancy, and there’s an Rh incompatibility in second and other future pregnancies, these maternal antibodies can damage the baby’s red blood cells. If this occurs, your baby might need a red blood cell transfusion either during your pregnancy or immediately after delivery.

How is Rh incompatibility treated?

If Rh incompatibility has been diagnosed, your doctor will most likely recommend Rh immune globulin (RhoGAM) in your seventh month of pregnancy, and then again within 72 hours after delivery if your baby’s blood type is confirmed as Rh positive upon delivery.

Rh immune globulin contains Rh IgG antibody, so your body does not react to your baby’s Rh positive cells as if they were a foreign substance, and your body will not produce its own Rh antibodies.

Update: Nigerian man who was told he 'looks like a chimpanzee' by his colleague awarded €30,000 for racial discrimination in Ireland

OFFICIAL IDYLLIC PROPERTY


A Nigerian national who was called a chimpanzee and subjected to monkey noises by his team leader at work in Ireland has been awarded €30,000 for racial discrimination.

 

LIB had reported that Victor Kings Oluebube, lost his race discrimination case against his employer last year. Read HERE
 

At the Labour Court, deputy chairman Alan Haugh has ordered recruitment firm CPL Solutions Ltd, trading as Flexsource Recruitment, to pay €30,000 to Oluebube for racial discrimination under the Employment Equality Act.

 

At the time of the two alleged racist incidents, Mr Kings Oluebube was assigned by Dublin-based firm CPL Solutions Ltd to Kuehne & Nagel as a warehouse operative.

 

Mr Haugh ordered CPL Solutions to pay out the sum after finding that the firm “is vicariously liable for the harassment in question”.


 
 

Haugh stated that in regard to the serious nature of the harassment and the effects that it has had on Mr Kings Oluebube, the redress for Mr Kings Oluebube should be dissuasive and proportionate to the injury suffered by him.

 

The €30,000 award is equivalent to approximately 63 weeks’ gross pay.

 

Mr Haugh said CPL Solutions was not able to avail of legal defences to racial harassment under the Employment Equality Acts after evidence was heard that no steps were taken to reverse the effects of the racial harassment experienced by Mr Kings Oluebube.


 
 

Mr Haugh also stated that CPL Solutions was not able to avail of a separate defence to the discrimination claim due to what the Labour Court described as the employer’s “very unsophisticated bullying and harassment policy" and to "the ad hoc approach" adopted by a Flexsource staff member to the investigation of the Mr Kings Oluebube's allegations.

 

The decision by the Labour Court reverses an earlier ruling by the Workplace Relations Commission (WRC) which dismissed Mr Kings Oluebube's claim for racial discrimination.


 
 

The WRC adjudicator in June 2020 found that CPL Solutions was able avail of a defence under the Employment Equality Acts by showing that it took steps to reverse the effects of the harassment and to prevent a recurrence.